The Washington Post
Navigation Bar
Navigation Bar

Enter symbols
separated by a space:


Look Up Symbols
Portfolio

Made Possible by:


  Funds Seek to Discourage Short-Term Investing

By Sandra Sugawara
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 10, 1999; Page H1

Mutual funds, it seems, are getting choosy about whose money they'll take.

They're looking for a long-term commitment – for better or worse, richer or poorer – and they're warning that fickle investors who stay a little while and then flee for greener pastures may get hit with a big, fat penalty.

Many mutual fund managers look back longingly on the good old days when investors stayed put. "Twenty years ago, the average holding period was seven, eight, even 10 years. Now three years is considered a long holding period. We consider that an insanely short period of time from which to judge a fund's performance," said Brian Mattes, a spokesman for the Vanguard Group of mutual funds.

To try to coax back that kind of patient behavior in investors in its Health Care fund, Vanguard imposes a 1 percent exit fee on "short-term" investors. In this case, "short-term" is defined as cashing out in less than five years.

Five years, of course, predates the rise of the Internet, the surge in online trading, the Asian economic crisis, the Russian economic collapse, day traders and a host of other events that have reshaped financial markets and reshuffled investment winners and losers.

Indeed, few other mutual funds have dared ask for that kind of long-term commitment. The minimum holding periods are generally either 90 days or 180 days.

So far, 354 of the 10,518 mutual funds have redemption fees. That's only about 3 percent of funds, but the number is growing, according to Morningstar Inc., a Chicago-based fund research company.

The reason? Mutual funds say they must protect long-term shareholders from "market timers," professional investment advisers who zip in and out of mutual funds to take advantage of sudden shifts in the market, and from the legions of individuals who are growing more demanding about short-term performance. Both groups yank money out of funds quickly when performance falls, sometimes forcing managers to sell stocks they might want to hold. This raises costs and can have negative tax consequences for remaining fund investors.

"I don't want money from people who intend to trade in less than three months. Those people make it too expensive to the long-term shareholders," said Bill Nygren, portfolio manager of the Oakmark Select Fund, which added a 2 percent exit fee on shares redeemed within 90 days.

Oakmark's exit fees, like most redemption fees, go back into the mutual fund – not to the management company – and are designed to cover the costs of the unexpected redemptions.

But some professional advisers counter that it's unrealistic to long for the old days of passive investing. "I think all of us are having to face a more volatile market these days. Everyone trades. Even mutual fund managers trade," said investment adviser Dave Petersen of Financial Services Advisory in Silver Spring. Petersen said the period he holds a mutual fund on average has been shrinking to about four to five months, and he has at times sold after only a couple of weeks.

Fund managers question whether such rapid turnover is actually smart investing. Financial advisers reply that it's their only protection in a market that swings widely. After one manager chastised investment adviser David Lucca for pulling a large sum of money out of his fund, which was not performing well, Lucca responded: "How long am I supposed to wait before I move? Should I lose 10 percent of my client's money before I move? Twenty percent? Thirty percent?"

"We manage $90 million held by individuals, mostly retirees. They don't have another 30 years to make back their money," said Lucca, a partner in Rhoads Grunden Lucca Capital Management in Lancaster, Pa., and president of the Society of Asset Allocators and Fund Timers.

Redemption fees are not new. Vanguard Health Care has had an exit fee since its inception in 1984. That original fee was 1 percent for those who pulled out before one year.

Likewise, market timers are not new. For years, a small number of investors have moved into and out of funds to try to take advantage of market moves. What is different now is that investors across the board seem to be focusing much more on the short term, Mattes said. "Maybe it's a sign of the hot market we're in," he said.

A bull market that has fixated the public on stocks, instant investment advice for anyone via the Internet, technology and services that make it easy to buy and sell, and media reports of phenomenal returns have all contributed to this short-term mentality.

Lucca acknowledges this makes a fund manager's job tougher: "I move $4 [million] or $5 million around, not $12,000, so I can imagine the feeling of panic that occurs when they see big chunks of money like that moving around."

"Hyper-market timers," as Lucca calls them, try to take advantage of daily movements or factors such as the time differences between markets, but he and most financial advisers do not engage in such practices, he said.

One example cited by fund managers: Market timers can exploit the time difference to make a bet on overseas markets using mutual funds. The performance of the U.S. stock market is a major influence on foreign stock markets, which generally open hours after the New York Stock Exchange has closed.

So if the U.S. markets surge, market timers "will show up, buy shares of the international fund, hold them for a few days and then be gone," Nygren said. Oakmark's exit fees have stopped that behavior.

Mutual fund supermarkets, pioneered by discount brokers Charles Schwab & Co. and Fidelity Investments, have contributed to the trend. These supermarkets offer a wide array of mutual funds from different families, enabling customers to move more easily among funds. To combat frequent switchers, Schwab and Fidelity both have exit fees that are triggered on funds held less than 180 days. Jeff Lyons, senior vice president at Schwab, said the company "wanted to create the appropriate speed bump" to slow down the frequent traders, who generate additional handling costs for Schwab.

Another factor has been the phenomenal performance of certain concentrated sectors – health care last year, Japanese equities this year. Investors pouring into these funds are attracted by the surging prices. "These are not long-term investors. They are trying to time a rotation in a marketplace," said Burton Greenwald, a Philadelphia consultant to mutual funds. He said they may make money for their own accounts but "rack up substantial expenses for the funds."

The first sign of trouble for fund managers actually may be when money starts gushing in. That happened to Vanguard Health Care about a year ago. After manning the customer service phones for two hours last fall, a startled John Brennan, chairman of Vanguard, confided to an aide, "We've got a problem."

Brennan periodically fielded customer calls but said he'd never heard the kind of frenzy he experienced that day – individuals clamoring to buy shares of the fund, which ended the year with a gain of nearly 35 percent. The callers didn't want reports, weren't interested in discussing risks, didn't even know the correct name of the fund. All they knew was its performance record.

Vanguard officials knew there was no way the fund could keep up that stellar track record. They also knew that investors who bought because of the performance numbers would sell because of them too, Mattes said.

After a net $560 million poured into the fund in January, Vanguard closed the fund and said that when it reopens, new investors will have to hold stocks for five years or pay an exit fee. For existing investors in the fund, the fee applies to additional shares they purchase.

Warburg Pincus Funds decided to slap a 1 percent exit fee on shares of its Japan Small Company Fund held for less than six months, effective Nov. 17, after Japan's economic rebound sent the fund soaring, catching the eye of short-term investors.

"It's safe to assume that most fund families in the industry want to curtail this [short-term trading] activity, and if they have to police it over the phone and have to impose fees, they are going to do it," said Robert Steele, a vice president of the Rockville-based Rydex Series Trust mutual funds.

Rydex, however, is the exception. Noticing the hostile reception many investment advisers were getting from traditional mutual funds, Rydex created a family of 22 funds designed for these financial professionals, with no redemption fees.

"Look, active money does indeed create problems. They give you money when the market is going up and you don't want it, and they take it when you need it, when the market is going down and you need a cushion. It also threatens tax efficiency. When mutual funds first came out, they were not designed to be traded," Steele said.

Rydex designed mutual funds with enough liquidity and flexibility that they could be traded without being disruptive to their operations, he said.

"In many ways, the mutual funds are victims of their own success, or at least of their own advertising," Steele said. "Mutual fund executives all do it. When they do well, they post their returns – best fund in its category. So what they are trying to do is to lure that flighty investor who gravitates to the high performer. If you live by that sword, you're going to die by that sword."

© 1999 The Washington Post Company

Back to the top
Navigation Bar
Navigation Bar