100 days
Click here to find out more!
 

R. Allen Stanford Spent Millions On Lobbying Congress, Campaign Contributions

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us mixx.com Share this on Facebook ShareThis

February 17, 2009 07:27 PM

I Like It I Don’t Like It
Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Buzz up!

Over the last ten years, R. Allen Stanford -- the Texas billionaire charged by the SEC today with "massive fraud" -- and his companies have spent at least $5 million on lobbying expenditures and campaign contributions to a bipartisan group of congressional leaders.

The heavy political spending comes despite Stanford's history of run-ins with federal regulators dating back at least to 1999, when he caught the attention of the State Department for his role in tightening the already-secretive banking laws of the Caribbean island nation of Antigua.

As the Clinton administration began vigorously investigating money laundering cases in 1999, Stanford hired a respected lobbying firm, Verner Liipfert, Bernard, McPherson & Hand. And starting in February 2000, Stanford Financial Group, "which had never made a federal campaign contribution before -- started pouring money into Republican and Democratic party committee," according to Public Citizen.

Stanford aimed most of his contributions at Congressional leaders, giving $95,000 to the 527 groups of then-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, then-House Democratic Caucus Chairman Martin Frost, and then-Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott ($5,000).

According to Public Citizen:

In doing so, Stanford became the single largest contributor between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001 to the 527 groups of Daschle and Frost...


Stanford gave an additional $100,000 to the Bush Inaugural Committee - as the new administration prepared its own money laundering strategy. More stringent controls were not proposed. Instead, the Treasury Department went to work watering down reporting requirements that are considered burdensome by many (including Stanford) in the financial services industry.61 In August, Treasury changed its tax shelter regulations to allow corporations to avoid some reporting requirements in an attempt to "ease tax administration."

Though tough anti-money-laundering legislation overwhelmingly sailed through the House Banking Committee in 2000, it had difficulty getting to another vote as powerful GOP lawmakers -- then-House Majority Leader Dick Armey, then-House Majority Whip Tom DeLay and then-Senate Banking Committee chair Phil Gramm stymied its future.

DeLay was among the largest recipients of Stanford's largesse. And "DeLay's committees paid for flights on Stanford's jets at least 16 times since 2003, including on Oct. 20, the day the former House majority leader was booked in a Houston courthouse on money-laundering charges," according to Bloomberg News.

Stanford Financial or its employees also contributed to the legal defense funds of three lawmakers tarnished by ethics allegations -- DeLay, Democratic Senator Robert Torricelli, Republican Bob Ney.

In recent years, Stanford has been especially active. In the 2008 election cycle, Stanford Financial Group's PAC contributed to a bipartisan group of lawmakers including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, current White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin and House Ways & Means Committee chairman Charles Rangel.

And in 2008, Stanford Financial paid $2.2 million to lobbyists James K. Conzelman and Lionel C. Johnson, which is more than the firm spent in the previous six years combined. Lobbying disclosure forms from last year state that the lobbyists met with members of Congress to discuss "general financial issues that might affect Stanford FInancial Group."

Over the last ten years, R. Allen Stanford -- the Texas billionaire charged by the SEC today with "massive fraud" -- and his companies have spent at least $5 million on lobbying expenditures and campa...
Over the last ten years, R. Allen Stanford -- the Texas billionaire charged by the SEC today with "massive fraud" -- and his companies have spent at least $5 million on lobbying expenditures and campa...
 

Comments
61
Pending Comments
2
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- New DreaminBig See Profile I'm a Fan of DreaminBig permalink

We simply must have reform. There should not be ANYONE allowed to contribute this type of money to anyone in Congress. It creates severe conflict of interest. The only thing members of Congress should be interested in is the best interests of the people that they represent. This will never happen as long as we allow lobby groups to influence our lawmakers. FIGHT FOR REFORM!!! Term limits included please!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 02/18/2009
- New SammyD See Profile I'm a Fan of SammyD permalink

sigh.....when will the American people realize that both parties are crooks? Not until it's too late.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 02/18/2009
- New Chavez08 See Profile I'm a Fan of Chavez08 permalink

The Limbaugh cheerleaders posting here are right, - this was all caused by Rangel and Dodd. It had nothing to do with Reagan destroying all the checks and balances on Capitalism or Dubya ignoring SEC warnings for the full 8 years. This was a carefully orchestrated, ingenius plan devised by two Democrats who were in the minority while the regulations were removed.

Boy!! - Dodd and Rangel are SA-LICK!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 02/18/2009
- New JulieSA See Profile I'm a Fan of JulieSA permalink

TIME mag:

"This is, of course, the same Chris Dodd who was Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee beginning in 2007, when the banks began their meltdown. He was the one who received the most campaign cash of any senator from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two companies that he defended against increased regulation that might have actually tempered some of the disaster that has followed. He was the one who spent a huge chunk of 2007 not in the Senate, but on the campaign trail, carrying out a lackluster presidential effort funded largely by the banking and insurance industries. � His top contributor was Citibank. His fourth largest contributor was the now-collapsed firm, AIG, a major purveyor of the complex derivatives that helped cause the crisis. He was also the one who in 2007 went before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to praise the "history of solid regulation" in the U.S. capital markets. "Win or lose, (people) invest with a high degree of confidence that American balance sheets are accurate, that investment products like securities and derivatives are properly valued, and that the markets are well-policed against those who would commit negligent, deceptive or fraudulent acts," he said."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 02/18/2009
- New notconfindtweenhatnboots See Profile I'm a Fan of notconfindtweenhatnboots permalink

Limbaugh needs to learn that when you point a finger at the other guy (right or wrong), you still have three fingers pointing back at yourself...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 02/18/2009
- New JulieSA See Profile I'm a Fan of JulieSA permalink

"Emplo yer: Stan ford Fina ncial Group
older results
$26,050 was given by people who identified their employer as "Sta nford Fina ncial Gr oup".
$3,600 from 2 people to Re publicans
$22,450 from 6 people to Dem oc rats"

http://fun drace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=emp&employer=Stanford+Financial+Group

Stanfo rd and most of his empl oyees who donated supp orted Oba ma for presi dent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 02/18/2009
- New Chavez08 See Profile I'm a Fan of Chavez08 permalink

Who were the politicians who removed the checks and balances on these guys?

Did the SEC warn anyone in the past 8 years? If so, who? What did they do about these warnings?

I'll wait for your answer.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 02/18/2009
- New JulieSA See Profile I'm a Fan of JulieSA permalink

"Employer: Stanford Financial Group
older results
$26,050 was given by people who identified their employer as "Stanford Financial Group".
$3,600 from 2 people to Republicans
$22,450 from 6 people to Democrats"

http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=emp&employer=Stanford+Financial+Group

Stanford and most of his employees who donated supported Obama for president.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 02/18/2009
- New Chavez08 See Profile I'm a Fan of Chavez08 permalink

Who were the politicians who removed the checks and balances on these guys?

Did the SEC warn anyone in the past 8 years? If so, who? What did they do about these warnings?

I'll wait for your answer.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 02/18/2009
- booker52 See Profile I'm a Fan of booker52 permalink

Another rich crook exposed.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 AM on 02/18/2009
- blanco See Profile I'm a Fan of blanco permalink

So why does he not have a cabinet position in the Osama administration???/ He sounds perfect!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 02/18/2009
- jeffp26 See Profile I'm a Fan of jeffp26 permalink

Because he was too close to Bush.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 02/18/2009
- New JulieSA See Profile I'm a Fan of JulieSA permalink

He donated to Obama's campaign, as did most of his top employees.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 02/18/2009
- Eyckie See Profile I'm a Fan of Eyckie permalink

You're listening to Rush Limbaugh again. Drink some more kool-aid. Obama is awesome and he is actually looking out for the middle class and the poor who make up a majority of the American population. Unlike Republicans who only want tax cuts for themselves and their rich friends.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 02/18/2009
- Ramirez See Profile I'm a Fan of Ramirez permalink

From Politico:
*****

Accused fraudster gave big to Dems

By KENNETH P. VOGEL | 2/17/09 2:52 PM Updated: 2/18/09 5:38 AM EST

The Texas financier accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission Tuesday of "massive ongoing fraud" was a generous political donor who gave more heavily to Democrats.

Since 2000, R. Allen Stanford, the chief of the Stanford Financial Group in Houston, his wife and company gave $2.2 million in political contributions " $1.7 million to Democratic candidates and committees " according to Federal Election Commission records.

The most recent donation on record was $300,000 from Stanford Financial Group to the Democratic Governors Association, a so-called 527 group not subject to campaign contribution limits.

Other big beneficiaries included the Democrats" congressional campaign committees, which received $1.2 million over the years, and their Republican counterparts, which got $322,000, including a $28,500 personal donation last year to the National Republican Congressional Committee. ...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18955.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 02/18/2009
- Lillopa See Profile I'm a Fan of Lillopa permalink

Could this be the lost of ...$30 Trillion dollars ...that disapeared around the world "Clinton" was talking about on Larry King last night ????? The super rich are out to "destroy the middle class" and make us "all poorer"... for cheap labour ???---"Rich bondage" over all of us? Rich vs Poor----banks will not lend money to break us all---then the rich come back from China---and were forced for cheap labour!........................................... Keep us in massive debt, poor , take our jobs under educated and the rich control us---WE NOW ALL BECOME THE "SLAVES" OF THE RICH?!

stand up and work with our Pres Obama and fight fight fight for our rights!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 AM on 02/18/2009
- ffejretsof See Profile I'm a Fan of ffejretsof permalink

Giving money to both Republicans and Democrats is ample evidence that we have to get corporate money out of politics. Some smart lawyer needs to find a way to argue that free speech does not include corporations, who have billions at their disposal, giving money to politicians. I do not believe the founding fathers had giving money to politicians in mind when they wrote to right to free speech. I think the believed of the right of People to have free speech, not corporations.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 02/18/2009
- digital See Profile I'm a Fan of digital permalink

EVERYTHING'S BIGGER IN TEXAS...EVEN THE SCAM ARTISTS AND RIPOFFS!!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 AM on 02/18/2009
- JulieSA See Profile I'm a Fan of JulieSA permalink

Bernie Madoff is still the king.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 02/18/2009
- marijam See Profile I'm a Fan of marijam permalink

Yup, best government money can buy. Is the statute of limitations out or can these people, Democrats and Republicans alike, be investigated for quid pro quo and prosecuted based on findings? Especially Tom Delay and Phil Gramm of course

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 AM on 02/18/2009
- New JulieSA See Profile I'm a Fan of JulieSA permalink

How about Chris Dodd and Charles Rangel? Stanford gave to them, too. Not only that, but those men are still serving despite the ethical clouds over them. It's much more urgent to expose any wrongdoing currently happening.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 02/18/2009
- jnratliff See Profile I'm a Fan of jnratliff permalink

When you are a crook and you are robbing people everyday it's easy come easy go!
Why do you think there are so many crroks in the senate and congress?
It's all the easy money. Money for nothing! Just being crooks and the repugs are the worst ever!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 AM on 02/18/2009
- cuzkate See Profile I'm a Fan of cuzkate permalink

One simple question as we all watch this horrible (all by intention) $$$ Mess---
When the hell is somebody going to jaillllllllllll? Illegal acts have been on
going since Enron. Why are these base line criminals being rewarded with
billions in cash and we the worker bees are shat upon on a daily basis. It
is a unique situation when the collective powers that be have systematically and
effectively destroyed our economy and ultimately destroyed us whom were
formally known as hard working PAID citizens of the greatest country on earth.
Oh so very sadly this is no longer so. Where are we headed??

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 AM on 02/18/2009
- bayside See Profile I'm a Fan of bayside permalink

5 million to congress for bribes, and we wonder why we always get the short end of the stick..The corruption is being exposed finally..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 AM on 02/18/2009
- elbzee See Profile I'm a Fan of elbzee permalink

Ever read Charley Reese's "The 545 People Responsible for America's Woes"? http://www.liberalsvsconservatives.com/the-545-people-responsible-for-americas-woes-t1957.html

Makes more and more sense as the light is gradually shown.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 02/18/2009
- New FearlessKnight See Profile I'm a Fan of FearlessKnight permalink

That is one of the stupidest blogs I've read in a long long time! It claims that the legislative and executive branch of government is in total control and thus responsible for everything that is wrong with the country. It overflows with simplifications, from assuming that everyone agrees on what's wrong and how it must be fixed to who's at fault for not doing it. It's a good thing this guy is a RETIRED journalist, I would shudder to think people would actually try to be informed by him.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 02/18/2009
- Name Not In Use See Profile I'm a Fan of Name Not In Use permalink

And he doesn't qualify for TARP money because ......?
After all, it is the Antigua-based "Stanford International BANK".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 02/18/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or 

 
Ads by Google
Meridian Stanford
Stanford Fraud Information. National Investor Law Firm.
StanfordFraud.com